Search
Now showing items 1-7 of 7
Antecedent variables for sociomoral reasoning development: evidence from two cultural settings
(Taylor & Francis, 1997)
This study examined the developmental pattern of sociomoral reasoning in two different cultural settings, focusing on factors assumed to influence the course of growth in this particular domain. The specific hypotheses ...
Sociomoral Reasoning in Congenitally deaf children as a function of cognitive maturity
(Taylor & Francis, 1991)
The operational and sociomoral reasoning maturity of 70 congenitally deaf children was examined and compared with the respective maturity of a sensory unimpaired control sample, matched in age (7‐13 years) and socioeconomic ...
Το πρόβλημα της επαγωγικής λογικής
(Βάνιας, 1991)
Στα 1787 ο Κanι χαρακτήρισε την παραγωγική τυπική λογική
ως ουσιαστικά συμπληρωμένη, και μάλιστα από τα χρόνια του
Αριστοτέλη. Για την επαγωγική λογική ο Κanι θεώρησε ότι η δική
του συνεισφορά στη γνωσιοθεωρία έλυνε για ...
On the simplicity of the curve hypotheses
(Springer, 1992)
Popper's theory of simplicity has three great merits advocating it: it has
intuitive appeal, it proposes a clear criterion for judging the relative
simplicity of rival hypotheses, and, finally, it answers the question ...
Οι νοερές εικόνες και τα θεμέλεια της γνωστικής Επιστήμης
(Αριστοτέλειο Πανεπιστήμιο Θεσσαλονίκης, 1995)
Στις 18 Νοέμβρη 1968, εδώ και είκοσι πέντε χρόνια δηλαδή, ο R. Shepard
κυκλοφορεί μεταξύ συναδέλφων και μεταπτυχιακών φοιτητών στο Stanford
ένα σημείωμα στο οποίο προτείνεται ένας γενικός τύπος πειράματος για να
ερευνηθεί ...
Deductive reasoning ability in causal, quantitative, and spatial context
(Ελληνικά Γράμματα, 1997)
The aim of this study was to investigate the deductive reasoning ability in different
contexts. Specifically, the deductive reasoning ability has been tested in
the form of six different logical inference types within ...
Interactions, Computations, and Experience: Interleaved Springboards of Cognitive Emergence
(Elsevier, 1999)
This rejoinder attempts to show that Bickhard's criticism is irrelevant to our theory and epistemologically one-sided. It is irrelevant because our theory is pragmaticist and interactivist at a number of levels ignored by ...