Consider the principal finding: A reply to William T. Ross

dc.contributor.author	Makridakis, Spyros
dc.contributor.author	Hogarth, Robin M.
dc.date.accessioned	2015-12-08T09:36:19Z
dc.date.available	2015-12-08T09:36:19Z
dc.date.issued	1988-05
dc.identifier.issn	0025-1909
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11728/6371
dc.description.abstract	By focusang on issues concerning precise reUuive perfonnance of the human and experimental teams, Ross crtsscutes the nugor, and a priori »ir[»ising result of our study. This is that the experimental teams were not all dominated by the human teams. Reidication is the aiqm^sdate way to illuminate tlK substantive issues raised by our study rather than aiguments based on ex-post and possibly questionaUe statistical analyses.	en_UK
dc.language.iso	en	en_UK
dc.publisher	INFORMS, Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences	en_UK
dc.relation.ispartofseries	Management Science;Vol. 34,Iss. 5
dc.rights	INFORMS, Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences	en_UK
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/	en_UK
dc.subject	Research Subject Categories::SOCIAL SCIENCES::Business and economics	en_UK
dc.title	Consider the principal finding: A reply to William T. Ross	en_UK
dc.type	Article	en_UK
dc.doi	10.1287/mnsc.34.5.672

Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as INFORMS, Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences