Consider the principal finding: A reply to William T. Ross

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMakridakis, Spyros
dc.contributor.authorHogarth, Robin M.
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-08T09:36:19Z
dc.date.available2015-12-08T09:36:19Z
dc.date.issued1988-05
dc.description.abstractBy focusang on issues concerning precise reUuive perfonnance of the human and experimental teams, Ross crtsscutes the nugor, and a priori »ir[»ising result of our study. This is that the experimental teams were not all dominated by the human teams. Reidication is the aiqm^sdate way to illuminate tlK substantive issues raised by our study rather than aiguments based on ex-post and possibly questionaUe statistical analyses.en_UK
dc.doi10.1287/mnsc.34.5.672
dc.identifier.issn0025-1909
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11728/6371
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherINFORMS, Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciencesen_UK
dc.relation.ispartofseriesManagement Science;Vol. 34,Iss. 5
dc.rightsINFORMS, Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciencesen_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectResearch Subject Categories::SOCIAL SCIENCES::Business and economicsen_UK
dc.titleConsider the principal finding: A reply to William T. Rossen_UK
dc.typeArticleen_UK

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
CONSIDER THE PRINCIPAL FINDING A REPLY TO WILLIAM T. ROSS.pdf
Size:
223.77 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download Abstract
Download

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.92 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Articles